Ajax Loader
Ajax Loader

Quickly search a project you’re looking for by Project Name or any Keyword that may be associated. For example: “wetlands”

  • Help Tips
Back to Overview

Click BACK at any time to return to the AMP Overview Screen.

Use these buttons to Share this project with a friend or colleague. Or you can Print or Download this view to your computer.

Project: Unstable Slopes Criteria - Empirical Evaluation of Shallow Landslide Susceptibility, Frequency, and Runout by Landform

  • Status: On-Track
  • Current Phase: Implementation

Click to EXPAND the Document Library on the left side. Then click on any file to download or view in a separate window.

The selected Project (the project you are currently viewing) will remain highlighted in the left bar.

Project Timeline:

January 1, 2020 - December 31, 2025

CMER Scientist:

Elise Freeman

Project Manager:

Theryn Henkel

Rule Group:

Unstable Slopes

SAG:

UPSAG (Upslope Processes Science Advisory Group)

Project Description

Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Section 222-16-050(1)(d)(i) lists the five rule-identified landforms (RIL) and directs the reader to Section 16 of the board manual where the RIL and their criteria are described in detail. Those five RIL are utilized by DNR’s FPA approval process to determine if timber harvest has the potential to deliver sediment or debris to a public resource or in a manner that would threaten public safety (WAC 222-10-030(2)(b), SEPA policies for potentially unstable slopes and practices). The Unstable Slope Criteria Project will evaluate the degree to which the landforms described in the unstable slopes rules and board manual identify potentially unstable areas that are likely to impact public resources or threaten public safety.

Current RIL definitions and criteria are based on landforms and processes that are inferred to yield relatively high landslide densities, are influenced by forest management, and are likely to have a probable significant adverse impact (WAC 222-10-030(2)(c)). They were developed from field observations, regional research, and watershed analysis data collected from various sources and methods. Observations of storm-induced landslides that have occurred since the current rules were implemented have shown that a sizable proportion of delivering hillslope landslides may originate from terrain that does not meet RIL criteria. Likewise, while models have been built that predict maximum runout potential, there are no explicit criteria for assessing delivery to public resources or risk to public safety.

The studies included in the Unstable Slopes Criteria Project use lidar-based landslide inventories and landform mapping, and assessment of vegetation and precipitation history to calculate shallow landslide susceptibility. The susceptibility and runout project objective is to develop methods to use lidar differencing to map shallow landslides and runout areas across the landscape accurately and to derive the topographic elements from digital surface models associated with location of the landslide. The landslide locations can then be associated with different landforms and terrain elements and the relative density of slope failures by landform can be calculated. The landslide density will be associated with measures of storm magnitude to develop a relationship between the landslide rate and the storm return interval.

Project Team

Theryn Henkel

Project Manager

Elise Freeman

Principal Investigator, NWIFC

Dan Miller

Project Team Member, M2 Environmental Services

Ted Turner

Project Team Member, Weyerhaeuser

Julie Dieu

Project Team Member, Rayonier Inc.

Tiffany Justice

Project Team Member, Weyerhaeuser

Jeff Keck

Project Team Member, DNR

Susan Shaw

Project Team Member, Weyerhaeuser

If there is an approved document associated with the phase shown, this will be a quick link to that file.

Phase

Associated Documents

Associated Documents

Associated Documents

Associated Documents

No documents associated with this phase.

Associated Documents

No documents associated with this phase.

Phase Timeline

Project Initiation
Jan 2016
Scoping
Jan 2017
Study Design
Jan 2020
Implementation
Jun 2024
Data Analysis
Sep 2025
Report Writing
Jan 2026
Apr 2027
* horizontal lines represent phase overlap

2023-2025 Biennium Budget

Biennium Budget Status

  • $18,574(26.39%)
  • $70,393
  • Expended To Date
  • Planned Budget
* Project Budgets do not include AMP Staff Salaries

2023-2024

2024-2025